<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revisiting the Comments Debate: The Self-Documenting Code Contest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.uncommons.org/2008/08/05/revisiting-the-comments-debate-the-self-documenting-code-contest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.uncommons.org/2008/08/05/revisiting-the-comments-debate-the-self-documenting-code-contest/</link>
	<description>Rants and opinion interspersed with awe-inspiring tales of heoric software engineering endeavours.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paan</title>
		<link>http://blog.uncommons.org/2008/08/05/revisiting-the-comments-debate-the-self-documenting-code-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-2208</link>
		<dc:creator>paan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uncommons.org/?p=106#comment-2208</guid>
		<description>even though you got disqualified I&#039;m still rooting for you to win the contest.
I&#039;m really am in the &quot;less comment is good&quot; camp.. but I don&#039;t really think that no comment at all is good..

anyway.. since they arbitrary chose the word &quot;documenting&quot; rather than say create a program that can take any word and create a 2 word anagram, using the word documenting as an example, it really means that the best way to do the program is your way..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even though you got disqualified I&#8217;m still rooting for you to win the contest.<br />
I&#8217;m really am in the &#8220;less comment is good&#8221; camp.. but I don&#8217;t really think that no comment at all is good..</p>
<p>anyway.. since they arbitrary chose the word &#8220;documenting&#8221; rather than say create a program that can take any word and create a 2 word anagram, using the word documenting as an example, it really means that the best way to do the program is your way..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Self Documenting Code Contest : Where Sparkes Used to Fly</title>
		<link>http://blog.uncommons.org/2008/08/05/revisiting-the-comments-debate-the-self-documenting-code-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-2203</link>
		<dc:creator>Self Documenting Code Contest : Where Sparkes Used to Fly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uncommons.org/?p=106#comment-2203</guid>
		<description>[...] Read all about it here via New adventures in software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read all about it here via New adventures in software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Nerd News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Self Documenting Code Contest</title>
		<link>http://blog.uncommons.org/2008/08/05/revisiting-the-comments-debate-the-self-documenting-code-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-2202</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Nerd News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Self Documenting Code Contest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uncommons.org/?p=106#comment-2202</guid>
		<description>[...] all about it here via New adventures in software Top blogs deconstructed, Real life photoshop., top 30 bits of javascript, Hottest jobs in IT or why [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all about it here via New adventures in software Top blogs deconstructed, Real life photoshop., top 30 bits of javascript, Hottest jobs in IT or why [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.uncommons.org/2008/08/05/revisiting-the-comments-debate-the-self-documenting-code-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uncommons.org/?p=106#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>Sharfah, I&#039;ll concede your first point.  &quot;get&quot; is better than &quot;generate&quot;.  I&#039;m not sure I agree with the second though.  You don&#039;t need to know where I got the words from ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharfah, I&#8217;ll concede your first point.  &#8220;get&#8221; is better than &#8220;generate&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not sure I agree with the second though.  You don&#8217;t need to know where I got the words from <img src='http://blog.uncommons.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharfah</title>
		<link>http://blog.uncommons.org/2008/08/05/revisiting-the-comments-debate-the-self-documenting-code-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-2187</link>
		<dc:creator>sharfah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uncommons.org/?p=106#comment-2187</guid>
		<description>Well, you&#039;re not generating them so you can&#039;t call it generateAllTwoWordAnagramsOfTheWordDocumenting! Also, looking at your code, there is nothing in there to tell me where you got those two word anagrams from. 

A better name would be:
getEightPairsOfWordsFromTheWordDocumentingFromTheAir=
    [&quot;ceding mount&quot;, &quot;document gin&quot;, &quot;condign mute&quot;, &quot;induct gnome&quot;,
     &quot;coming tuned&quot;, &quot;gnomic tuned&quot;, &quot;cumin tonged&quot;, &quot;cum denoting&quot;]

You fail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you&#8217;re not generating them so you can&#8217;t call it generateAllTwoWordAnagramsOfTheWordDocumenting! Also, looking at your code, there is nothing in there to tell me where you got those two word anagrams from. </p>
<p>A better name would be:<br />
getEightPairsOfWordsFromTheWordDocumentingFromTheAir=<br />
    ["ceding mount", "document gin", "condign mute", "induct gnome",<br />
     "coming tuned", "gnomic tuned", "cumin tonged", "cum denoting"]</p>
<p>You fail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.243 seconds -->
