<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java Archaeology: Revisiting 20th Century Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.uncommons.org/2008/06/20/java-archaeology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.uncommons.org/2008/06/20/java-archaeology/</link>
	<description>Rants and opinion interspersed with awe-inspiring tales of heoric software engineering endeavours.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: henk</title>
		<link>http://blog.uncommons.org/2008/06/20/java-archaeology/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>henk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uncommons.org/?p=88#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>Good post! And then to think that if we left matters in the hand of some 'purists', today's Java would have been exactly like Java 1.1. You know, those kind of people who complain with every change in Java and constantly complain the Java library is supposedly so bloated etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post! And then to think that if we left matters in the hand of some &#8216;purists&#8217;, today&#8217;s Java would have been exactly like Java 1.1. You know, those kind of people who complain with every change in Java and constantly complain the Java library is supposedly so bloated etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.233 seconds -->
