Tired Programmers Damage Your Project
I completely agree with David Heinemeier Hansson’s recent article, Sleep Deprivation is not a Badge of Honor.
I’ve seen many examples of this kind of counter-productive attitude in software development. From developers on an hourly rate contributing 100-hour-plus work weeks to maximise their pay, to teams being expected to work evenings and weekends just to be seen to be doing something to rescue late projects, even though that “something” is ultimately detrimental both to the project and to the team.
The accepted wisdom seems to be that if we can do X amount of work in 40 hours then in 80 hours we ought to be able to do, if not 2 * X, then at least more than X. This is based on the dubious assumption that some extra work is always better than no extra work. We may expend more effort but it’s quite likely that the effort will be wasted introducing bugs, making poor design decisions and doing other things that will invariably cause more work later on.
The ever-infallible Wikipedia lists confusion, loss of concentration, impatience, memory lapses, depression and psychosis among the many effects of sleep-deprivation. These don’t sound like ideal traits for a software developer.
Speaking from personal experience, the impact of tiredness on my concentration is the real productivity killer. If you put in extra hours at the beginning of the week you may find it impossible to repay the debt until the weekend, which means you’ll be working at a sub-optimal level for days.
At a company were I worked several years ago we would routinely work late into the evening to try to get more done. Except there was one developer who was extremely reluctant to put in additional hours and generally managed to avoid doing so. This was tolerated because he was consistently the most productive member of the team and produced the best quality code. It didn’t occur to me at the time but the reason he produced the best work was probably largely because he wasn’t working stupid hours, unlike the burnt-out hackers who were checking in poorly thought-out, error-strewn code every night.
It is vital to be able to disengage form the task at hand. To go away and come back with a fresh perspective and new insights. You can’t see the big picture with your nose constantly pushed up against the canvas.
An Industry of Addicts
Tiredness often leads to programmers relying on stimulants, usually caffeine, as a substitute for adequate rest. It would appear that developers who don’t have a caffeine dependency are in the minority. I’ve had colleagues who need two cans of Red Bull just to kick-start their brains in the morning and others who drink several cups of ridiculously strong black coffee to keep them going through the day. Of course, here in Blighty, the delivery method of choice is the humble cup of tea – backbone of the British Empire.
High caffeine consumption has a whole host of nasty side-effects that complement the effects of sleep-deprivation perfectly. Insomnia is the real kicker. You need to sleep, you are knackered, but you can’t sleep because of the caffeine. So you either go to bed later or you lie awake for hours. When the alarm goes in the morning you are not recharged. You drag yourself out of bed and drink that first coffee/tea/Red Bull to get you started for the day. You are an addict, just in a slightly more socially-acceptable way than if you were smoking crack in the back alley.
“The Zone” and Peak Mental Performance
All developers are familiar with “The Zone”: that elusive state of mind where the code flows and in an hour we achieve more than we could in a week outside of the zone. What is less clear is how do we get into the zone in the first place? Lack of sleep doesn’t help. If you are tired you won’t find the zone. Too much caffeine probably has a similar effect.
So what else affects our mental performance? I am ignorant in these matters but it seems reasonable that diet and general well-being would play a part. This makes Google’s strategy of free meals and snacks particularly interesting. Not only are they providing a perk that may encourage people to work there, nor are they merely encouraging their employees to lunch together to encourage team-building and sharing of ideas. They are also taking control of their workers’ nutrition, rather than leaving them to subsist on Mars Bars and Coke. It would be fascinating to see a study into what kind of impact this had on staff performance and whether it came close to offsetting the apparently huge cost. The best athletes leave nothing to chance in their preparation. Nutrition is part of this. Maybe it’s the same for more intellectual endeavours?