<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Praise of JiBX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.uncommons.org/2007/07/16/in-praise-of-jibx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.uncommons.org/2007/07/16/in-praise-of-jibx/</link>
	<description>Rants and opinion interspersed with awe-inspiring tales of heoric software engineering endeavours.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.uncommons.org/2007/07/16/in-praise-of-jibx/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uncommons.org/?p=31#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying that it automatically makes it worthwhile or valuable (I still don&#039;t see the point of much of Commons Lang), just that I feel a bit bad (only slightly) having a go at people for producing something that I don&#039;t have to pay for or use (I&#039;ll leave that to experts like yourself ;) ).  Just because the contributors are volunteers is no reason to ignore problems with their work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying that it automatically makes it worthwhile or valuable (I still don&#8217;t see the point of much of Commons Lang), just that I feel a bit bad (only slightly) having a go at people for producing something that I don&#8217;t have to pay for or use (I&#8217;ll leave that to experts like yourself <img src='http://blog.uncommons.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).  Just because the contributors are volunteers is no reason to ignore problems with their work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hani Suleiman</title>
		<link>http://blog.uncommons.org/2007/07/16/in-praise-of-jibx/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Hani Suleiman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uncommons.org/?p=31#comment-37</guid>
		<description>JiBX is indeed a fine library, though I have to (still!) take exception at your opening paragraph. Just because something is free and someone is willing to do it does NOT automatically make it worthwhile or valuable. I&#039;m sure you could probably find plenty of people willing to &#039;volunteer&#039; their &#039;free time&#039; to come &#039;crap on your doorstep&#039;. Is criticising them harsh, given that they&#039;re choosing to do what they love in their own time and are making it freely available to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JiBX is indeed a fine library, though I have to (still!) take exception at your opening paragraph. Just because something is free and someone is willing to do it does NOT automatically make it worthwhile or valuable. I&#8217;m sure you could probably find plenty of people willing to &#8216;volunteer&#8217; their &#8216;free time&#8217; to come &#8216;crap on your doorstep&#8217;. Is criticising them harsh, given that they&#8217;re choosing to do what they love in their own time and are making it freely available to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.197 seconds -->
